Dear brother Tom J
I appreciate your desire to correct me where I might have made a mistake. You say about it:
<<What keralabrethren1 pointed out about the follow up comment in the other thread (Genealogy of Jesus Christ) was bluntly accurate. Those of us who regularly make contributions on this forum must be willing to recognize the flaws in our judgment also. There is not one person here who hasn’t made any mistakes.>>
I am puzzled about the whole thing. Here is the whole story:
Someone asked a question about Geneology of Christ. Others answered, and I kept watching from time to time. Finally when all of them had said what they wanted to say, I appreciated them for their contributions and added some additional information. There there was a gap of 3 weeks between the first post of the person who asked the question and my post, and I did say so.
For this, Keralabrethren1 said "Shame on that statement of Johnson". (Keralabrethren1 and I have patched up after he accepted that his non fluency of English might have prompted him to attack me).
Now here is my question to you brother Tom J: what was the mistake on my part that you want to point to. I mean
1. Is it essential that everyone on this forum should post every day.
2. Is it essential that there should be no gaps in my posting.
3. Keralabrethren1 pointed out to a gap. That was not the point of contention between him and me. The point of contention was him saying "Shame on that statement". Even that statement he corrected when he said that non fluency of language might have imparted meanings not intended, and the problem was solved.
I am confused about why you brought up that thread where the problem has already been settled with a confession about language by Keralabrthren1, an apology by him, and an apology by me ??
I would love to hear from you -- but do look into that thread once again, do look at the statements in this thread, and then please help me to understand the thrust of your argument.
Johnson C. Philip